lua-l archive
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Subject
:
Re: Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
From
: liam mail <liam.list@
...
>
Date
: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 12:33:47 +0100
On 15 September 2013 12:13, Dirk Laurie
<
dirk.laurie@gmail.com
>
wrote:
The resulting bytecode can
be disassembled but not decompiled.
That is a rather bold statement. The bytecode without debug information can be both decompiled and disassembled[1] with the correct tools.
--Liam
[1] With a close to yet maybe not the same end product source, which will produce the same bytecode if you round trip it.
References
:
Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
,
Jayanth Acharya
Re: Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
,
Dirk Laurie
Prev by Date:
Re: Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
Next by Date:
Re: Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
Previous by thread:
Re: Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
Next by thread:
Re: Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
Index(es):
Date
Thread