[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Is obfuscation meaningful way to protect proprietary Lua code ?
- From: Ross Bencina <rossb-lists@...>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:22:43 +1000
On 17/09/2013 5:53 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
2013/9/17 Marc Balmer <email@example.com>:
Actually development and testing is very easy,
and once you deploy, aou encrypt the bytecode.
Do you then run that bytecode via a Lua program
loaded by an unmodified PUC-Rio standalone interpreter?
Not sure if you guys saw the recent paper about reverse engineering the
Drop Box client (written in Python but with encryption and a modified
interpreter with scrambled bytecode):
Obfuscation is hard whether or not you're executing on a standard