[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison
- From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:09:04 -0500
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Roberto Ierusalimschy
<roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> Moreover, his comments about Java at the end of the page shows how
> unbiased he is. This "benchmark" does not seem to be made to really
> evaluate different languages, but to lambast Java. (As Lua handles
> strings similarly to Java, it was caught in the crossfire.)
right, the comment son Java and Perl are quite telling.
what i found interesting is that Python performed so well, since the
code is similar. I guess that somewhere in the many megabytes of
special-cases in the language core there's something that manages to
optimize bad code.
--
Javier
- References:
- Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, Daniel Bolgheroni
- Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, kamicc olo
- Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Prev by Date:
Re: Why Mobile Apps Are Slow
- Next by Date:
Re: stdout to buffer
- Previous by thread:
Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison
- Next by thread:
Re: Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C, C++, Lua, tcl, javascript and Java comparison
- Index(es):