[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?
- From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:34:45 -0500
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
<lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> If you never use real numbers in Lua, you won't pay any price for
> processing floating point.
i think some non-FPU architectures have to link with a float library
if your code has any float operation. there might be a space
advantage by not having the code, no matter if it's executed or not.
--
Javier
- References:
- Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, Miles Bader
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, Rena
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, Miles Bader
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, steve donovan
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, Miles Bader
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, Rena
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, David Burgess
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, David Burgess
- Re: Lua 5.3: functional version of // operator?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo