On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@gmx.net> wrote:LPegJ targets LPeg 0.10, while LuLPeg targets v0.12.
> lpegj seems interesting too (thanks!). LuLPeg might be more compatible and
> It can be fun to compare their respective speeds (if speed is a concern, of
The LuaJ metamethod limitation `p + 1` working, but `1 - p` not
working has been solved in the mean time, so I'd expect it to be,
compatible with the original.
It may be fun, for someone with the know-how, to write a backend for
LuLPeg that compiles patterns to Java bytecode.