Re: [ANN] Specl 3 released

[Romulo <romuloab@...>]

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:44 AM, steve donovan
<steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Romulo <romuloab@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looks really interesting, but have you considered the MIT or LGPL
>> licenses instead of GPL?
>
> Doesn't really feel like a big issue for a testing support tool....
> it's unlikely to be embedded in an application.

That's true, but you don't really have to embed it. If I implement a
support library, say, for http mocks, and require it, does my support
library fall under the GPL, or this don't count as linking?

>