[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Ruby philosophy vs Lua philosophy
- From: joao lobato <btnfdp.lobato@...>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:29:47 -0100
On 28/02/2013, Andrew Starks <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, joao lobato <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> I would like to have an automatic way to pack a core (5.1, 5.2,
>> LuaJIT2) with a configurable set of "batteries", for a given target
>> (windows, linux, ...).
>> I think that would serve both the uses cases of having a small
>> language to be embedded and a general-purpose language for
>> scripting/prototyping/systems programming.
> I think you've almost perfectly summed up LuaBuild , if I'm not
>  https://github.com/stevedonovan/luabuild
Hmmm.... I think so, too. Then what are we bickering about ? :-p