Re: Ruby philosophy vs Lua philosophy

[joao lobato <btnfdp.lobato@...>]

On 28/02/2013, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, joao lobato <btnfdp.lobato@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I would like to have an automatic way to pack a core (5.1, 5.2,
>> LuaJIT2) with a configurable set of "batteries", for a given target
>> (windows, linux, ...).
>>
>> I think that would serve both the uses cases of having a small
>> language to be embedded and a general-purpose language for
>> scripting/prototyping/systems programming.
>>
>
> I think you've almost perfectly summed up LuaBuild [1], if I'm not
> mistaken.
>
> [1] https://github.com/stevedonovan/luabuild
>
> -Andrew
>
>

Hmmm.... I think so, too. Then what are we bickering about ? :-p