[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
**Subject**: **Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?**
**From**: Elias Barrionovo <elias.tandel@...>
**Date**: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:39:59 -0200

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Michael Richter <ttmrichter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Allow me to summarize this "debate" so we cease speaking in endless circles:
> "The way I learnt things is self-evidently superior for logical reasons that
> are so OBVIOUS that I can't explain them."
>
> There. We've just cut through about 99.44% of language debates.
BTW, today's XKCD awesomely fits this thread: http://xkcd.com/1172
--
NI!

**References**:
**Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***colinz*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Robert Virding*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***sergei karhof*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Joseph Manning*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Ross Bencina*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Joseph Manning*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Miles Bader*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Steve Litt*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Miles Bader*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Dirk Laurie*
**Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, ***Michael Richter*