On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Fabien <
fleutot+lua@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Michal Kottman <
k0mpjut0r@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> if anyone finds an encryption library as an alternative to PolarSSL which
>> is not GPL licensed, I would be more than willing to re-license the whole
>> code as MIT/X11.
>
>
> libtomcrypt is public domain (and we're in the process of releasing LTN12
> bindings to it under Eclipse public license; it's under intellectual
> property review as we speak). I don't know whether it offers all the codecs
> you're interested in.
if i'm not mistaken, libtomcrypt is under maintenance mode with very