2012/12/4 Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch>:
> this is bogus and wrong on so many levels.
> there are 109'242 digital glyphs (codepoints) defined and
> what you offer here is just a poor and limited subset.
> totally useless.
Bogus, wrong, poor, limited, useless.
Nobody needs more than a poor and limited subset. The actual
subset varies according to context, granted.
Bogus, wrong, poor, limited, useless.
It should be quite obvious to a competent Lua programmer
how to adapt the basic methodology to the needs of his/her
particular situation.
Bogus, wrong, poor, limited, useless.
I work with text that was originally composed in ISO8859-1 or Windows
1252 and brutally translated by iconv. My original
comment said "this is what I do". I find it useful for, as I said,
"key generation, indexing, alphabetic sorting etc ".
> Actually you deserve a U+1F44A for this ;)
In the font used by my e-mail reader, which by the way has
no problems in displaying Chinese, Korean and Arabic,
I just get a rectangle containing the six digits, so I cannot
grasp the doubtless brilliant import of the remark.
Bogus, wrong, poor, limited, useless.
