[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Integer division
- From: GrayFace <sergroj@...>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:25:21 +0700
Will integer-valued floats be converted to integers when used as table
keys? Otherwise the array part of tables optimization will fail. What
would happen after this code: "t = {0}; t[1.0] = 0;"?
All this doesn't feel like a good idea to me.
I think 32-bit integers would be beneficial to speed as an
implementation detail, producing float result in case of integer
overflow of an operation. (wrote this before I saw the comment about
existing patch)
I'm totally with Wolfgang Pupp about 64-bit integers, except I'm not
advocating for making them heavy userdata (more on this in a moment) and
think that tostring should output "5" for such number, not "5ll". But
64-bit number are domain-specific, not needed most of the time, so they
should be separated from regular numbers. And it's not about
compatibility, it's about keeping Lua clean.
It would actually be great to have subtypes of lightweight userdata, and
it's a perfect fit for 64-bit ints. In Lua there is free space for
"small subtype" field in value struct. Light userdata values of
different subtypes would be different. Add a function to allocate the
subtype, functions to create typed light userdata and check subtype and
it will be a very nice addition.
On 22.11.2012 22:04, Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
Moreover, it does not address the other part of the current proposal:
to make Lua better for small platforms with no hardware support for
doubles. -- Roberto
It's unclear to me how your proposal would help with this task.
Integer division operator is good anyway, with or without integers as
types. How about '\'? Both '\' and '//' are already used as integer
devision operator in some languages. E.g. '\' is used in ColdFusion.
--
Best regards,
Sergey Rozhenko mailto:sergroj@mail.ru
- References:
- Re: Integer division, Jay Carlson
- Re: Integer division, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Integer division, Jay Carlson
- Re: Integer division, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Integer division, Jay Carlson
- Re: Integer division, Wolfgang Pupp
- Re: Integer division, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Integer division, Wolfgang Pupp
- Re: Integer division, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Integer division, Wolfgang Pupp
- Re: Integer division, Roberto Ierusalimschy