[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: autotools alternatives, is anybody using autosetup?
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:23:20 +0200
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov@tut.by> wrote:
> gives Windows developers A LOT of power. So, it makes sense for them
> to learn UNIX tools once and use them for years. IMHO mingw is not relevant.
Ah, but if I want Unix, I know where to find it ;)
Mingw is relevant because it's a straightforward way for people to get
a good working GCC on their computers, especially with the Dragon
distribution. 15Meg download, they have a C compiler. But they won't
have anything more than GNU make, and that's often not enough. This is
why things like CMake are definitely relevant here, even though it
makes my eyes bleed.
steve d.
- References:
- Re: autotools alternatives, is anybody using autosetup?, Sam Roberts
- Re: autotools alternatives, is anybody using autosetup?, Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: autotools alternatives, is anybody using autosetup?, Xavier Wang
- Re: autotools alternatives, is anybody using autosetup?, Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: autotools alternatives, is anybody using autosetup?, steve donovan
- Re: autotools alternatives, is anybody using autosetup?, Aleksey Cheusov