[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [BUG] Table constructor not equivalent to left-to-right assignment (Was: Testing for a sequence ...)
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:55:36 -0300
> In that case the manual should not be using the wording "is equivalent
> to" (paragraph 3.4.8) leading to the example.
> Manual is very specific here, albeit incorrect.
Why incorrect? In that particular example the two forms are equivalent.