[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: The impact of a module's license on the requiring Lua
- From: Mike Pall <mikelu-1204@...>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:11:46 +0200
steve donovan wrote:
> Yes, a tool for static linking is potentially a minefield. I'm going
> to very careful about this, because respect for licenses is part of
> the core open source ethos. (and it can get you into trouble) (Oh, and
> actually stick a proper MIT/X11 license on the thing ;))
While you're at it: Lua uses a variant of the MIT license, not the
MIT/X11 license. There's a difference. I've made that mistake
before. A discussion is somewhere in the mailing list archives.
I've decided to refer to it as the MIT license and link to:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
--Mike