[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaSocket development status
- From: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:14:31 +0400
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 22:47, Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> https://github.com/LuaDist/luasocket
>
> LuaDist doesn't contain any changes to luasocket that I saw, so I
> wouldn't call it a fork.
Logistically it is still a fork. You have to track it if you care for
post-2.0.2 luasocket.
>> http://code.matthewwild.co.uk/luasocket2-hg/
>> https://bitbucket.org/liamdevine/luasocket_ipv6_lua_51_52
>
> The second is an extension of the first, btw.
Most inconvenient.
Compare with how natural GitHub forks are.
Alexander.
