[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb")
- From: Jay Carlson <nop@...>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:43:52 +0000
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> writes:
>> Its been pointed out before, that using strings and parsing them and
>> returning a function is a way of providing this
>> kind of terseness in an environment that requires it:
>
> Albeit, one of the most insanely awful ways imaginable ("wanted to
> access a surrounding local variable... hahaha, too bad!")...
It's purely coincidence I have a construct to handle just that....
Jay
(mad "north by northwest" scientist)
- References:
- A lua version of "amb", Xavier Wang
- special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb"), Jay Carlson
- Re: special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb"), Fabien
- Re: special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb"), steve donovan
- Re: special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb"), Dirk Laurie
- Re: special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb"), Ross Bencina
- Re: special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb"), Sam Roberts
- Re: special forms, take two (was Re: A lua version of "amb"), Miles Bader