[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004)
- From: HyperHacker <hyperhacker@...>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 01:36:20 -0700
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 01:35, Enrico Colombini <erix@erix.it> wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 7.49, HyperHacker wrote:
>>
>> A thought: what if Lua allowed for the user to provide a different
>> hash function at build-time or when creating the Lua state? The
>> original function is good enough for the majority of use cases, but in
>> cases like this where excessive collisions could be an issue, you
>> could provide an alternate, maybe even using hardware-accelerated
>> hashing...
>
>
> Oh sorry, I hadn't seen your message before posting mine. I wasn't trying to
> steal the idea ;-)
>
> --
> Enrico
>
Great minds think alike.
--
Sent from my toaster.
- References:
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), TNHarris
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Mark Hamburg
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Tom N Harris
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Mark Hamburg
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Vladimir Protasov
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Leo Razoumov
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Vladimir Protasov
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Miles Bader
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Ashwin Hirschi
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Miles Bader
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), William Ahern
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), HyperHacker
- Re: Hash Table Collisions (n.runs-SA-2011.004), Enrico Colombini