Completeness of refman precedence table

[Lorenzo Donati <lorenzodonatibz@...>]

Hi all!

I've read the refman several times but strangely I only noticed recently 
that the precedence table in section 3.4.7 (I'm referring to 5.2.0, but 
the table is the same in 5.1.4) doesn't mention the following operators:

function call "()"
array indexing "[]"
field access "."
method call ":"

Not that this prevented me to be confused writing code, but somehow I 
subconsciously applied java/C/C++-like precedence rules for those and 
got away with it (I suppose that those operators have the highest 
precedence in Lua too).

I'm I missing something? Is there a reason to omit them?

Any enlightenment appreciated. TIA!

Cheers!
-- Lorenzo