[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Table dot number?
- From: Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@...>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:57:08 +0200
It complicates the rules to satisfy a special case. For consistency,
could always write all such functions as
Would it really? The change wouldn't need to be in the grammar, but a rather simple change in the tokenizer. Everything after a . (if not part of a number) is to be tokenized as identifier and never as language construct. Then it should run through the existing parser without any changes.