[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Lua-friendly OSes
- From: Ben Kelly <ranavin@...>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:11:15 -0400
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:27:59 +0100
Matthew Wild <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On which systems has the Lua ecosystem (libraries, etc) developed
> > best?
> Windows (thanks to Lua for Windows), Debian/Ubuntu (thanks to the
> quality and quantity of Lua packages in the repository, including
> Platforms I've encountered less Lua joy on are the RPM-based Linux
> distros, including RHEL, CentOS, etc. simply because the packages are
> broken or inadequate, often requiring compiling things from source
> (entirely possible, just less than convenient).
My own experience parallels this.
- Debian and its derivatives (Ubuntu, Mint, etc) reliably have lua and
a lot of commonly-used modules like luasocket and copas in the
repositories, once you figure out their weird package naming scheme.
- Windows would be a pain in the ass, except that for most apps you can
just say "install Lua for Windows" and you have everything you need;
it only gets annoying when you need to use a binary library that's not
included in L4W, or a more recent version than L4W includes.
- OpenSUSE has a weird mix where it has lua, luafilesystem, luaexpat,
and a bunch of lua binding generators, but is missing other common
libraries like luasocket.
- Other RPM-based distros like Fedora I've had similar experiences to
SUSE on, although I haven't used any recently.