[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?
- From: Matthew Wild <mwild1@...>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:42:41 +0100
On 12 October 2011 17:16, Sam Roberts <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, HyperHacker <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I can't seem to reproduce the missing-last-bytes issue except in my
>> server, which is rather large and complex for a testcase and is using
>> threading and the acceptfd patch. (I did test acceptfd in a smaller
>> script as well.) Who knows why that's happening.
> What's the acceptfd patch?
It allows creating a LuaSocket object from an fd. Would be very
useful, but not provided in standard LuaSocket because of portability
concerns (ie. Windows).