Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?

[Matthew Wild <mwild1@...>]

On 12 October 2011 17:16, Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, HyperHacker <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I can't seem to reproduce the missing-last-bytes issue except in my
>> server, which is rather large and complex for a testcase and is using
>> threading and the acceptfd patch. (I did test acceptfd in a smaller
>> script as well.) Who knows why that's happening.
>
> What's the acceptfd patch?

It allows creating a LuaSocket object from an fd. Would be very
useful, but not provided in standard LuaSocket because of portability
concerns (ie. Windows).

Regards,
Matthew