Re: 5.2: equality for closures

[Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>]

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
> But given heavy "magic" smell of the suggested alternatives, I
> probably would have either to bite the bullet and use table, or create
> and bind my own newproxy()... Table would probably be more
> LJ2-friendly... (when/if LJ2 would support 5.2).

Mike has hinted that he likes newproxy():
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2011-01/msg00723.html

let's hope this stays so!



-- 
Javier