[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3
- From: "Thomas Harning Jr." <harningt@...>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:48:25 -0400
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Reuben Thomas <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 10:07, Marc Balmer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> LGPL is not acceptable due to the condition that an end user must be
>> able to link against newer versions of a library.
> That's a new one on me! Reference? I can't find anything about a
> problem like this...
That is the premise of LGPL, you cannot statically link to it for the
fact that a user cannot pull in new versions of their own altered
version of the given LGPL library.
Thomas Harning Jr.