Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3

["Thomas Harning Jr." <harningt@...>]

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org> wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 10:07, Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch> wrote:
>>
>> LGPL is not acceptable due to the condition that an end user must be
>> able to link against newer versions of a library.
>
> That's a new one on me! Reference? I can't find anything about a
> problem like this...
That is the premise of LGPL, you cannot statically link to it for the
fact that a user cannot pull in new versions of their own altered
version of the given LGPL library.


-- 
Thomas Harning Jr.