[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: PUC Lua
- From: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 02:30:17 +0400
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 01:07, Jim Whitehead II <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Francesco Abbate
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> 2011/5/8 David Kastrup <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>>>> Maybe it's time for the makers to choose a name, even if it should
> Other than differences in the libraries that are provided, such as the
> differences in the bitwise operations and the inclusion of ffi and
> friends in LuaJIT, are there any other instances where LuaJIT strays
> from the specification given in the Lua Reference Manual, which as I
> understand it is the definition of 'Lua'?
> I'm asking because I honestly am not terribly family with how much
> LuaJIT changes. Are there any semantic differences that aren't
> implementation details?
We found one recently here on the list: LuaJIT2 io.lines() is not
conforming to the manual.
Also, no string.dump() and also no custom allocators in x86_64 builds.