Re: PUC Lua

[Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>]

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 01:07, Jim Whitehead II <jnwhiteh@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Francesco Abbate
> <francesco.bbt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2011/5/8 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>:

>>>> Maybe it's time for the makers to choose a name, even if it should

> Other than differences in the libraries that are provided, such as the
> differences in the bitwise operations and the inclusion of ffi and
> friends in LuaJIT, are there any other instances where LuaJIT strays
> from the specification given in the Lua Reference Manual, which as I
> understand it is the definition of 'Lua'?

> I'm asking because I honestly am not terribly family with how much
> LuaJIT changes. Are there any semantic differences that aren't
> implementation details?

We found one recently here on the list: LuaJIT2 io.lines() is not
conforming to the manual.

Also, no string.dump() and also no custom allocators in x86_64 builds.

Alexander.