[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: anything wrong by not using "module" ?
- From: Gaspard Bucher <gaspard@...>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:05:24 +0200
Do you think your changes could be used in another project (I was going to hack around the LuaDoc module tag too...) ?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:43 AM, steve donovan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In fact, using module() is getting old-fashioned ;) It is deprecated
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Gaspard Bucher <email@example.com
> Thanks for the answer, Matthew. I'll add a return and will continue to not
> use "module".
in Lua 5.2, and personally I like no-magic modules.
Some tools do need to be taught new tricks. I used a modified form of
LuaDoc to generate documentation for Penlight in the form I wanted,
i.e. so that one would not get the functions reported as 'mod.name'
but rather 'name'.