[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break
- From: Paul Hudson <phudson@...>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:41:06 +0000
Oh, this is getting silly.
I don't mean I was joking and expected people to work this out in some culturally dependent fashion.
OK, this is getting silly. I said in my original
> Can we have computed go to? <link>
> (I am joking [...]
That's rather more explicit even than a smiley.
and in my whine about it, I said
> I did say on the next line (which both responses omitted) that I was joking when I made the request
And now you omit that line from your response and vaguely accuse me of omitting a smiley
It's not culturally dependent to identify that a joke was intended when that's explicitly stated!
Paul (perhaps being a bit oversensitive tonight, but apparently deliberate omissions of key statements in responses do tend to annoy me).