Re: I'd give my right arm for a continue statement

["Patrick Mc(avery" <spell_gooder_now@...>]

""
> This is not a serving suggestion (as they say on packages) just an
> indication of how the idea would work - actual syntax is always up for
> debate.
>
> steve d. ""

I am very weak with C++ but do you think that named labels in 
conjunction with a C++ "using" like statement would give people finer 
grain control over scope. Could something like this be implemented 
through meteatables?

It might diffuse the module debate as well. With named labels/using 
could people not just choose scope and include/require/import/dofile etc 
other files directly into the namespace the programmer has set?

-Patrick