Re: Virgin tables

["J.Jørgen von Bargen" <jjvb.primus@...>]

Am 30.12.2010 14:14, schrieb uki:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong:
> * if table has no holes # works
> * if table has holes you don't know what # will return (it might 
> return proper length or lenght of the first 'block' up till the first 
> hole)
> Do I understand this properly?
You missed one:
... or the last index of any fragment

But I have one other question:

Assuming a table which is virgin, how does virgin_table[0]=something 
affect # ? Is this predictable?

Regards, Jørgen