Re: Lua binding compare-and-contrast

[Tim Mensch <tim-lua-l@...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/14/2010 9:16 PM, Tim Mensch wrote:
> I finally dug into several that seemed appropriate for the project I'm
> working on, and found serious problems with each one. If anyone is
> interested in my findings, I posted them in a blog entry [1].

Sorry for the noise (and for the double post earlier; email program
wanted to send before I was done), but in all fairness I wanted to post
that some of the "serious" problems weren't as serious as I first
thought. Had a measurement issue.

The summary is that LuaBind and OOLua did NOT take up as much as I'd
thought, though they were still the heaviest bindings. I ended up
rebuilding all tests and verifying my numbers.

I'm still planning on using tolua++ for now, but will likely end up with
custom bindings eventually -- possibly using Dub or a ported-to-Lua Dub. :)

Tim

[1] http://realmensch.org/blog/fun-lua-bindings
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNCpZNAAoJENSbqLBCyKKs0sIH/2UKwcnvs6Q+uFui2oxJMF08
N2ooHyyOckf5IyyJAXXSCtIeikPo1atC3MbnuQptJURUiDf07ouUfUp5nbLb1LPS
J9WPNs/M4wIlFEVJGQP/7pphZdPIYS6DngT3zKDSUbnFC7hwcvAI/tWXYghxHorr
dnDGm0GUN/ccfNQYxHyOajxr8J80DzTHW9ZDtPwynn67hS5gK1I2P/Qwr5CuIKke
b04bOOIzQcpQXEwHhaJMVRkvKJlV3hsSUF4OE82XltIXql/XqL1DqBh3CjnohaGT
LrbJidKmIHZo9siUEb81gUm7rxqExRFuQN1rd/VPiq0nYfE/0aH+veuwDYe3TSk=
=Gitg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----