[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view
- From: David Kastrup <dak@...>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:37:44 +0100
Mark Hamburg <mark@grubmah.com> writes:
> Or to put a more focused point on this discussion but stepping away
> from syntactic specificities: Should functions (or some functions) be
> as well supported syntactically as tables?
The Lua approach would be to _make_ functions tables. Then one need not
worry about one being supported differently from the other.
--
David Kastrup
- References:
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, steve donovan
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, phlnc8
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Doug Lua
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Luis Carvalho
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Mark Hamburg