[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view
- From: Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@...>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:42:58 +0100
> Or to put a more focused point on this discussion but stepping away from syntactic specificities: Should functions (or some functions) be as well supported syntactically as tables? What would be gained by doing so? How much clarity would be lost by doing so? Etc. (Obviously the clarity question fairly rapidly comes back to syntax.)
{[( The core problem may be ASCII only has 3 types of brackets and a
<pseudo one> - as if viewing this from a human language perspective
wouldn't be kinda of funny already - this isn't enough)]}
- References:
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, steve donovan
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, phlnc8
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Doug Lua
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Luis Carvalho
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Mark Hamburg