[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: reducing patch complexity and conflicts
- From: HyperHacker <hyperhacker@...>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:50:53 -0700
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 23:54, David Manura <email@example.com> wrote:
>> (IIRC something like all types in a certain range represent
>> objects that need garbage collection) and I couldn't figure out how to
>> change all such assumptions to accommodate it.
> Looks like "#define iscollectable(o) (ttype(o) >= LUA_TSTRING)".
There was that, but just changing that wasn't enough, so there must
have been other issues I missed somewhere.
Sent from my toaster.