[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lightweight function syntax (again)
- From: Pierre-Yves Gérardy <pygy79@...>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:54:28 +0100
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 18:46, Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> I dont think it would be ambigious, as currently a less sign can never
> be followed by an open parenthesis. It would always need a value first
> to be less than something else.
>
Indeed, it would not be ambiguous. It would require more changes to
the parser than the other propositions (if I remember correctly, I
haven't looked at it for a while), though, but I guess it doesn't
really matter.
-- Pierre-Yves
- References:
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Petite Abeille
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, steve donovan
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, steve donovan
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again), Drake Wilson
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again), Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again), Joseph Manning
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again), Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again), Axel Kittenberger
