[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lightweight function syntax (again)
- From: "Joseph Manning" <manning@...>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:26:54 +0000
On 2010-Nov-23 (Tue) at 18:11 (+0100), Axel Kittenberger wrote:
>> Just playing around, how do you like these, all of the same grammar,
>> different cases:
Dear Axel,
Not bad. Although I'd prefer => over = for denoting "return".
But ... OUCH! ... surely an empty parameter list should be
denoted by <> rather than just < which, IMO, looks grotesque!
Thus, using your first and fifth examples,
( <> = nil )
and
( <> if upvalue then print "yes" end )
Joseph
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Manning / Computer Science / UCC Cork Ireland / manning@cs.ucc.ie
------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Petite Abeille
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, steve donovan
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Mark Hamburg
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again) Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha-rc2) now available, steve donovan
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again), Drake Wilson
- Re: Lightweight function syntax (again), Axel Kittenberger