Re: LPeg 0.10

[Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@...>]

On 10/11/2010 05:56, Wesley Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Miles Bader<miles@gnu.org>  wrote:
> > Nick Gammon<nick@gammon.com.au>  writes:
> > > > Returns a string with the running version of LPeg.

Indeed, it is a string, in classical format.

> > > This is inconclusive about how to compare versions.

Use common sense? (And tradition.)

> No matter the format, it could be spelled out at least:
>
> Returns a string with the running version of LPeg for the form "major.minor"

It won't hurt to be precise, indeed. There is a strong tradition, but we all know 
exceptions to it... :-)

--
Philippe Lhoste
--  (near) Paris -- France
--  http://Phi.Lho.free.fr
--  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --