lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, steve donovan
> <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> fwiw, luaposix is maintained. lposix is not or luaposix would never
>>> existed in first place.
>>
>> That's the impression I get, and perhaps we should try to prefer
>> luaposix over lposix for this reason...
>>
>> (It's the one packaged in Debian, for instance.)
>>
>> Does Luiz have any comment to make on this?
>
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2007-05/msg00087.html

Does any module require lposix specifically (ie, being dependent on
lposix and incompatible with luaposix)? Would anyone mind if it was
removed from the LuaRocks repository?

-- Hisham