lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, steve donovan
<steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> fwiw, luaposix is maintained. lposix is not or luaposix would never
>> existed in first place.
>
> That's the impression I get, and perhaps we should try to prefer
> luaposix over lposix for this reason...
>
> (It's the one packaged in Debian, for instance.)
>
> Does Luiz have any comment to make on this?

http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2007-05/msg00087.html

>
> steve d
>

-- 
Natanael Copa