Re: bit.lshift and performance - luabitop v.s. lua-5.2.0-work4

[Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>]

Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote:
> time luajit-2.0.0-beta4 -e "for i=1,1e9 do end"
>
> real    0m0.864s
> user    0m0.840s
> sys     0m0.010s
>
> still not as good as mike's, but well into 21st century!

I'm getting 0.359s with luajit-2.0.0-beta5 (built with MinGW), on a very 
cheap PC.

--
Shmuel