[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re[2]: gpl issue
- From: Bulat Ziganshin <bulat.ziganshin@...>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:21:41 +0400
Hello Rob,
Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 8:16:41 PM, you wrote:
>> sorry but you are wrong. changing license of modified sources to more
>> prohibitive one is very common operation. lgpl explicitly says that
>> this code is allowed to be relicensed under gpl
> Doesn't the LGPL say you are allowed to use the product under either the
> LGPL or GPL? I don't believe it says you can "relicence" it, just that
> you have the choice.
all these licenses (mit, lgpl,gpl) are about source code license, not the
program usage. you can sell it or make money on monthly subscription - it's
completely different topic
>> mit/bsd explicitly allows to do *everything* with the code, including
>> redistributing it with any license
> No, it does not. It allows sublicencing.
"to deal in the Software without restriction, including... sublicense"
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com