Re: Lua Modules Development List (was Re: LuaBatteries.org ?)

[KHMan <keinhong@...>]

On 9/3/2010 8:43 PM, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 07:53:01PM +0800, KHMan wrote:
> > If you are too permissive and get spammed, the list might be
> > disabled (deleted) automatically. But you can ask Chris DiBona for
>
> So they are able to detect you have been spammed, but not to prevent the
> list being so... funny, but not that nice IMO, expecially the
> auto-delete feature cmobined with the no-archives one.

No, specifically, any lists not marked as 'adult' gets deleted 
quickly and automatically if any adult spam gets in. Undeleting is 
a real pain, unless you bypass their normal channels as a F/LOSS 
entity and bother someone higher up in there.

So, permissive membership or web page edit there is a really bad 
idea. Marking as 'adult' is bad since it might not be allowed in 
corporate settings.

> The @lists.lua.org option sounds better to me, and it's domain may also
> make it sound more "official".

GGroups is good if one wants to use a free service. In this case, 
lists.lua.org has obvious advantages.

[Sorry for the OT topic, will minimize postings.]

--
Cheers,
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia