[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Globals (more ruminations)
- From: Vaughan McAlley <vaughan@...>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:38:20 +1000
On 16 July 2010 19:32, Juri Munkki <jm_list@cameraid.com> wrote:
> Strict.lua only checks code that executes. In order to test your code for
> missing local declarations, you have to make sure that all your code has
> been tested while strict.lua is active. If you use strict.lua all time
> while developing code, it's probably not a problem.
>
A patch to the parser that lists variables it considers as globals
would be pretty straightforward.
Vaughan
- References:
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Mark Hamburg
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Geoff Leyland
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Juri Munkki
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Patrick Donnelly
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Geoff Leyland
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Geoff Leyland
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), joao lobato
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Miles Bader
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Jonathan Castello
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Miles Bader
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Jonathan Castello
- Re: Globals (more ruminations), Juri Munkki