[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: 5.2 work3 manual
- From: HyperHacker <hyperhacker@...>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 20:31:19 -0600
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 19:53, Javier Guerra Giraldez <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:13 PM, T T <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Which makes me wonder why #t is not specified in such a way to be
>> usefull for tables with holes too.
> can you suggest such a definition that also:
> - is useful for tables without holes
> - is quick to compute
> - has none or minimal memory requirements.
> - has none or minimal overhead on field assignment
How about the number of elements in the table? (i.e. number of keys
whose values aren't nil, for you pedantic types)
Sent from my toaster.