Re: petition to keep ipairs alive

[Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>]

Mark Feldman wrote:
> > There are a few other "syntactic sugar" constructs in Lua, so
> > why is ipairs singled out?
> It's trivial to add yourself, as demonstated in PIL:
> [...]

It's a matter of convenience. Those wanting ipairs to stay, want it 
out-of-the-box. (I, for one, wouldn't like to "require 'ipairs'" in 
every little script I write).

--
Shmuel