Re: lua_signal

[Matthew Wild <mwild1@...>]

On 13/04/10 03:05, Sam Roberts wrote:
> And why do you go through the effort of counting signals? Signal
> delivery is not reliable, the pending
> signals are a bitmask, there is no counting for non-realtime signals.
>    
We encountered an issue with it in Prosody whereby multiple signals in 
quick succession (that is, multiple signals before the Lua callback is 
actually called) would mess up the lua-signal state and cause looping. 
Counting/queuing the signals seems an appropriate solution to me, but do 
correct me if I'm wrong.

Matthew