[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?
- From: Jonathan Castello <twisolar@...>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:01:19 -0700
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jonathan Castello <twisolar@gmail.com> wrote:
> cat "foo" "bar" "baz" ""
> or
> cat "foo" "bar" "baz" ()
Of course, only one of these is actually nil; the other is just empty.
Apologies ;)
~Jonathan
- References:
- Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, M Joonas Pihlaja
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, frank
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Shmuel Zeigerman
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Henk Boom
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Shmuel Zeigerman
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Duncan Cross
- Re: Backslash-newline escape as a line continuation rather than a newline?, Jonathan Castello
