Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2)

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> and in this case you can't even easily use (5.1) lua_cpcall:
> 
>   static int
>   actually_push_string(lua_State *L)
>   {
>       /* Wait a minute, there's no good way to get the string back
>          if the return values go away. */
>       lua_pushstring(L, (char const *)lua_touserdata(L, 1));
>       return 1;
>   }

In 5.2, luaL_cpcall is able to return values. Doesn't that solve
the problem? (luaL_cpcall is also cheaper than 5.1's lua_cpcall.)

-- Roberto