[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: a new proposal for environments
- From: Pierre-Yves Gérardy <pygy79@...>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:33:26 +0100
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 20:20, Jonathan Castello <twisolar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not for files, something that's been mentioned before recently: you'd
> have to use the io library explicitly, and you could have any number
> of valid reasons to not include that..
I don't understand what you mean... :-/
Could you point me to the relevant context?
> [...] But I don't see anything useful
> coming out of letting, say, a sandboxed module load things into the
> global environment instead of its own.
Couldn't you do
sandbox.load = function(chunk) return loadin(sandbox,chunk) end
?
- References:
- a new proposal for environments, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: a new proposal for environments, steve donovan
- Re: a new proposal for environments, Peter Cawley
- Re: a new proposal for environments, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: a new proposal for environments, David Kastrup
- Re: a new proposal for environments, Enrico Colombini
- Re: a new proposal for environments, Duncan Cross
- Re: a new proposal for environments, Jonathan Castello
- Re: a new proposal for environments, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: a new proposal for environments, Jonathan Castello