Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy

[Mark Hamburg <mark@...>]

On Feb 17, 2010, at 9:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:

> By the way, it would also be possible to just use "repeat" which already
> is a reserved word.  If its use is restricted to the same places where
> "break" and "return" are allowed, I don't think that there is syntactic
> ambiguity.

Maybe not with a little extra lookahead, but if you see:

	if not_ready() then repeat

What are you in the midst of parsing?

Mark