[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy
- From: David Kastrup <dak@...>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:36:19 +0100
Majic <majic.one@gmail.com> writes:
> How about `skip' or `next'?
Too likely to be used as identifiers. In particular "next" is pretty
much the established standard link name for linked lists. "skip" is
also likely to be used in skip lists or as a variable name for strides.
--
David Kastrup
- References:
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Florian Weimer
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Kelley, Brian
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Matthew Wild
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Kelley, Brian
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Matthew Wild
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Given
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Kastrup
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Mark Hamburg
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, David Kastrup
- Re: continue/repeat...until false dichotomy, Majic