You may want to use two bitLibs simultaneously, for a particular
combination of compatibility, ease of use, new features or whatever.
In that case it would be good if they had different names.
Vaughan
2010/1/28 Jerome Vuarand <jerome.vuarand@gmail.com>
2010/1/28 Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com>:
> If someone wants to replace existing library, he should pick another
> name for the replacement. Especially if that someone is not people who
> develop the language.
As long as the library has the same API, I see no reason not to use
the same name. This is especially important if you want a third party
module to use the modified version.